Day 348/365 "I Caught You!"

Originally uploaded by Wellstone


I like Twitter and social media in general. I like blogging and reading other blogs more enjoyable than mine as well. However, (you knew there was a “but” coming) one constant trend irritates me from time to time. The social media and blogging landscape is full of what I call bandwagon stops.

Bandwagon stops are like bus stops, only they’re bandwagon stops, so typically everyone jumps on when the bandwagon comes along. Oh and yes, almost everyone climbs aboard the bandwagon. Consider the couple of years I’ve been active on Twitter. For better or worse, these are some of the bandwagons I’ve seen nearly everyone (sometimes including myself) climb aboard.

  • Bandwagon Stop #1: “Twitter is going to revolutionize the way business is conducted!”
  • Bandwagon Stop #2: “Here’s how you should use Twitter…”
  • Bandwagon Stop #3: “The only rule of Twitter is there are no rules.”
  • Bandwagon Stop #4: “It doesn’t matter how many followers you have.”
  • Bandwagon Stop# 5: “Boo Oprah and Ashton Kutcher!”
  • Bandwagon Stop #6: “You have to be transparent.”
  • Bandwagon Stop #7: “You have to earn social currency!”
  • Bandwagon Stop #8: “Justin Bieber!”
  • Bandwagon Stop #9: “When it comes to social media, it’s all about your influence.”
  • Bandwagon Stop #10: What’s next?

So what’s my point?

Here’s the deal. You and I would do well to pass on a few bandwagon stops from time to time. Even when it comes to our offline lives for that matter.

In the early 1990′s I really wanted a GUESS t-shirt. All the cool kids had them and since I thought I was cool, I needed one too. I use the word “needed” loosely. Since I was a teenager without a job, I didn’t have much money, so I would ask my parents to buy one for me occasionally. They never would. Most of the time the answer involved something about them being “overpriced” and “you don’t have to wear what everyone else is wearing.” I didn’t get it then. I get it now. It was a bandwagon stop. I was there and I wanted on that bandwagon, but it was a pretty pointless bandwagon to jump on.

The next time a bandwagon stop is in view, think a little before climbing aboard the bandwagon. Sometimes it’s best just to let it pass, but sometimes it could be good not to follow everyone and instead offer some alternatives. Try to find something that needs to be said or in the very least provides a different take on the current bandwagon stops. Maybe your ideas will make more sense and be more beneficial to everyone in the long run.

We could all use a break from Bieber Fever anyway.



Facebook

Originally uploaded by Balakov


If you surf the Interwebs much these days, you’ll see many are worked up over the recent Facebook changes and what they mean to the privacy of its users. It seems this outrage comes and goes in cycles. I’ve seen Tweets of people saying they were leaving Facebook. I’ve read blog posts of people saying they don’t want Facebook making their private information public.

Just STOP!

How did Facebook get that information? You gave it to them. Furthermore, where does Facebook reside? The Internet. Here’s a simple solution to your privacy issues: Don’t give Facebook (or any other networking tool) any information you wouldn’t others to see. It’s so simple, it’s stupid it even has to be said. If you didn’t want people to see those photos of you behaving badly, why were you sharing all of that with your Facebook friends in the first place? Especially if you didn’t want it to be consumed by the public?

Also, why is the outrage often limited to Facebook? Didn’t you just Tweet about your dog peeing on your carpet? I wouldn’t have minded that bit of information remaining under your privacy umbrella. Didn’t you just check in on Foursquare at your favorite restaurant? Now I know you’re not home. Didn’t you just create your house on Gowalla? Now I know exactly where you live. Didn’t you just blog about your job, smearing your boss and coworkers? Now they will know how your really feel.

Oh, but you’re upset that Facebook changed the privacy terms and now you have to go in and tweak them. I see.

Finally, aren’t you usually the first person to spot a private Twitter account and accuse that person of not understanding what social media is all about?

So stop crying about Facebook every time they make a change in their business model or terms of service. Share, but don’t share what you wouldn’t want shared with people who may not know you, or your grandma. It’s easy. It’s simple. It will keep your blood pressure down when changes come along.

Your thoughts?





Originally uploaded by Breath of Life


We interrupt this regularly scheduled post of Mix Tape Monday for the following public service message.

  • Disconnect.
  • Put down the mobile phone.
  • Turn off the laptop.
  • Get out.
  • Look around you.
  • Go for a walk.
  • Make eye contact.
  • Have some face to face conversations.
  • Talk to a friend.
  • Talk to a stranger.
  • Make a new friend.

Sometimes I think we focus so much on social media and connecting through the Internet, we’re forgetting the importance of some of these very basic social things. How can we be more connected when we’ll barely lift our faces from our phones when we cross paths?

Get out and connect in person. It’s usually more rewarding.

4/365 – ducky

Originally uploaded by fotowelle

A post about trolls, the fallacy of anonymous comments, and your town.

I currently live in Joplin, Missouri in case you didn’t know. Joplin isn’t a city, but I wouldn’t exactly say it was small town America. If it were a child I’d call it a tween.

In 1960 living here might have limited me to more local endeavors. Connections would have been limited to the local world Joplin was creating. The network may have been smaller, but still very important in order to succeeded in any endeavor. All the basic rules would have applied. Hard work, generosity, kindness, honesty, and so on.

In 2010 I can write something, take a photo, or make a video, post it on the Internet, and someone sitting in Zevenaar, The Netherlands can see it within seconds (yes, YOU. Thanks for stopping by). Anyone all over the world can see what you’re doing if you should choose to share it on the Internet. Suddenly Paris, France doesn’t seem so far away from Joplin, Missouri. It’s a newer and more exciting world (technologically speaking) we live in today.

Yesterday, Joplin. Today, the world.

But, don’t kid yourself into thinking it’s not local. It’s still local. It’s just a larger, local world.

What Am I Getting At?

The same basic rules still apply. Hard work, generosity, kindness, honesty, and so on. It doesn’t matter what year, town, or part of the world you live in. These rules (and a few others) of human decency apply. Always.

The funny thing about the Internet is some think because they’re behind a computer screen halfway across the world they can do anything, say anything, and act anyway they want. Sometimes they don’t even have to be halfway across the world. Sometimes they’re just across town, but behind the perceived security of a computer screen. Here’s the deal, people: even if you think you’re anonymous, you’re not. There are always ways to find out who you are. The Chicago Tribune has a detailed article on this subject here.

So why are you trolling around?

The Takeaway

Just because I have access to people who will never set foot in Joplin, Missouri, doesn’t mean I can toss decency aside. You and I must still act as if this is small town 1960. The basic rules still apply. It’s been said a thousand times, but I’ll say it again. Anything and anyone can be Googled. A few clicks here, an email there, and few dollars over here and people can find out a lot about you. If you’re trolling around sites being a menace to society, people can (most likely will) find out.

In 1960 if you were being a menace to the limited, local world you would have been found out eventually too. Guess what that means? Nothing much has changed. Be a troll if you must, but understand we probably know who you are.

… a lesson in changing your social media tactics.

@4StatesNews vomiting blind links.

Yesterday I asked, “Why are you in social media?” I primarily directed it to businesses who seem to have a presence on social media just to have a presence. You know who they are. They’re rarely engaging their customers, usually not providing any special offers, or real assistance for their customers. Sure, they’re on Twitter, but they’re just vomiting links and telling everyone they have a presence.

Today, I’m going to give you an example. My local NBC (KSN) and ABC (KODE) news affiliates have a combined Twitter account and I’m convinced they’re using social media simply because everyone else is. There doesn’t seem to be much of a game plan, they rarely (if ever) interact with their viewers, and much of what they are doing makes them look like a spammer.
So, @4StatesNews, if you’re reading this I would like to offer a little advice on repairing your current social media strategy. It’s a simple start, but it will help create some value in your social media endeavors.
3 Social Media Tactics @4StatesNews Should Change
  1. Blind Links. I thought no one but spammers, phishing schemes, and bots did this. Actually even most of those will carry with them some sort of spammy headline with an ‘lol’ attached at the end. Here’s the deal, @4StatesNews, most people with even basic knowledge of the Internet won’t click on blind links. You must have a headline of some kind to let people know what they’re going to. You may be a trusted name in local news on the TV, but when it comes to the Internet, it’s a different ballgame.
    Suggested Solution: This is a simple fix. Just start adding headlines every single time. If your link leads to story about a local police officer dying, say that. Let us in on where we’re going. Your viewers want to know the link is safe before they commit to a click.


    Tweet blind links. People make up their own headlines.

  2. Using Your Facebook Fan Page as a Landing Page. Once you’ve repaired your problem of blind links, it’s time to do something different about where those links go. All of your links go to your Facebook fan page. I get it. You want people to follow you on Facebook too, but you need to be treating them as two different tools. When I click on a link that I think is going to send me to a story about the snow storm coming in, I don’t want to have to click on another link to bypass your Facebook page. How many people get to the Facebook page and then just quit clicking through? How much more traffic would you get to your site if the links you are sending out on Twitter actually went directly to your site. How many of your viewers don’t have a Facebook page? Do you think they like being directed in one direction before they get the story they were looking for?
    Suggested Solution: I think it’s clear. Stop using your Facebook fan page as a landing site. Direct your viewers straight to the story you want them to see. Don’t make the journey any harder than one simple click. If you want people to become a fan on Facebook, use Twitter to invite them to become a fan on occasion, but don’t back door the invitation by using the fan page as your landing site.
  3. Engage Your Viewers. Having a presence on all the key social media outlets doesn’t mean you’re engaging your viewers. It doesn’t even mean they’re paying attention. In fact, if you’re constantly sending them blind links that redirect them to Facebook, they may be paying little attention at all. It doesn’t mean you have to be online all the time. It just means you @, RT, or DM them when you can on Twitter. It means you respond to comments on your Facebook page when you can. I hate to say it, but your local news competitor KOAM TV 7 does a much better job at this. They interact with their viewers regularly and will even retweet stories that don’t go back to their site.
    Suggested Solution: As often as possible, interact. If your follower on Twitter has taken the time to @ you, take the a couple of seconds to respond back. If your follower on Twitter retweeted your story, take a moment to tell them thank you. It will go a long way in encouraging them to retweet your links in the future. The great myth about social media is that it’s easy. The great truth about social media is that it works best when you engage people.
This isn’t something I just recently stumbled across. My friend, Stan Kost has been asking for some time why the blind links are being sent out (among other things). I’ve joined in on some of those conversations, but they’ve always been one-sided because there is never any interaction. Just more blind links, Facebook, and now Stan mocking the blind links with funny, fake headlines.

So, @4StatesNews, why have you signed up for social media? Why sign up if you’re not going to do it right?


Salt Lake City, Utah
Originally uploaded by LShadrack

As a business, why are you signing up for social media?

Are you doing it because it’s the next big thing? Is your plan simply to have a presence? Are you signing up because your competition is? You shouldn’t be.

I guess this is what I really want to know is, why sign up and create a presence if you aren’t going to do it right?
If you’re just vomiting links on Twitter or only talking about yourself on other outlets, what’s the point? When does the social in social media come in? Where’s the interaction with your followers, readers, or viewers? Where’s the clue that reveals you’re truly interested in doing the work necessary to make social media work for your business?
Your customers want to know.


Superfamily – Steven & Kim
Originally uploaded by Glenn Karlsen

People are blogging, Tweeting, and yammering on and on about social media these days. If you took in everything being said, you’d think the world had changed so much that some of the most basic tenets of human interaction and business were no longer necessary. You’d also be wrong.

Social media is just a toolbox with a bunch of tools (Twitter, Facebook, blogs, Google Wave) in it, and those tools are constantly changing.

Is social media changing the way many do business with one another and even interact socially? Absolutely. Is social media revolutionizing human behavior? No.

Here’s what I mean:

  1. Social media won’t help you interview better – You still need some of the most basic of social skills. You still need to interview well. Also, you still need a resume, no matter what Seth Godin tells you. Will your activity on social media help or even hurt your chances of getting a job? It can, but in the end you will still need to impress in person (that’s IRL for you social media nerds). You can’t go into an interview and simply say “Please read my Tweets for information.”
  2. Social media won’t help you if you’re a jerk - You can use social media to enhance your personal brand and make yourself look like a genius, but if you’re a jerk in real life it will shine through at some point. It will eventually make it to social media and those who get to know you, that you’re a fake or real downer in real life. Soon enough, no amount of personal branding through social media will be able to hide it either.
  3. Social media won’t improve your social skills – In fact, it might just hurt them. Sure, you’re talking to people more often, but not in person. You’re hiding behind a computer screen. It’s a safety net that’s nice when you just want to wear your pajamas and keep your slightly disheveled hair. Nothing can ever take the place of good, old fashioned face to face interaction. Looking someone in the eyes and having a conversation is far more valuable than a retweet or @. Period.
  4. Social media won’t improve your life – It’s a tool, people, not a cure for all your ills. Sure, you can find some great inspiration from others. You can learn great workout techniques (like my wife frequently searches for). You can find information on how to live a healthier life overall. You can find tips, strategies, and ideas on how to improve your financial situation. In the end, you still have to get out there and do something.

I know it can be easy to get caught up in the whole, social media is changing everything mentality. We all would love for that to be the case, but it’s not. You still have to get out there and act. You still have to work. There’s a lot social media can do, but there’s quite a few things it won’t do for you.


Newspapers For Sale
Originally uploaded by drewmaniac

The Obama administration has indicated they would be open to extending bailouts to newspapers. Why?

This isn’t a political statement in any way. Take all the political issues out of this and I think one question needs to be asked. Why should newspapers be bailed out when they are dying?

I don’t mean they’ve simply fallen on hard times (they have), I mean they are on their way out altogether (they are). There will come a day when newspapers, in their current paper form, will be obsolete and that day is fast approaching.

People aren’t reading newspapers, but it’s not because we’re in a recession. People had stopped reading newspapers long before the markets collapsed. People aren’t reading newspapers because they can read the news online and they can get the news from other mediums. It’s that simple. Moreover, most newspapers are struggling because they refused to see this coming in spite of all the clues that it was going to happen.

It was just a year and a half ago that I wrote about holding out hope that newspapers would somehow survive in the printed form. Today, I’m convinced only a select few will (if any). The newspaper industry must adjust to the online world. That’s all there is to it. A bailout doesn’t do anything but extend the life of an already dead (albeit walking dead) medium.

Newspapers don’t need a bailout. Newspapers need to adjust to the changing market.

Recommended reading: Seth Godin’s post, When newspapers are gone, what will you miss?


oye
Originally uploaded by miabuelanoloentiende .com

Those who are best at networking don’t network. They make friends.

When you’re friendly, when you serve, when you’re focused on being the very best you end up with more than just a sell. You have more than just another customer. You have a friend.

Focus on the relationship with the customer, serving them, and building trust with them, you gain a friend who will tell their friends.

I don’t know a single spammer who can make that claim.


Disappointed
Originally uploaded by Carlo Nicora

One time I went on a date that I thought was going well. The dinner was nice. The conversation during dinner had been good. We had a lot in common, or so I thought. As I was driving her home I suddenly realized she was responding to me with one word answers such as, “Yes.”, “No.”, and so on. She was staring straight ahead and her eyes were glazed over. She was no longer interested in our conversation. No matter what I brought up, I couldn’t get much more of a response from her. I was essentially talking to myself. Needless to say the night ended without a second date in my future.

Looking back, part of the problem was that I wasn’t considering my listener. We had made decent conversation about the couple of things we had in common earlier in the night, but I had run out of things to talk about and I was starting to talk about things that didn’t involve my listener. As a result, she had nothing to add.

What do you talk about? Do you include your listeners? Whether it’s your blog, casual conversation, or any other area of your life it’s important to include people in your conversation. After all, who wants to have conversations with themselves?

No one likes being around someone who likes to hear themselves talk.

If you’re not asking questions, you’re not including your listener. If you’re asking questions, but thinking of what to say next while they answer, you’re not including your listener. If you’re only talking about the mundane things in your life, you’re not including your listener. When you don’t include your listener, they will have nothing to add, and you may never get another chance.

In short, if you don’t include your listener, don’t expect to get a second date.

Related Posts with Thumbnails